![]() I have read your numerous comments on Cloudy Nights regarding SkyX and I fully understand the annoyance of unsupported equipment and the disappointment of slow development and release. Like you, I use an ST-2000XM and it works well with SkyX but I have never used your mounts or other cameras.Įdited by Ken Sturrock, 13 December 2014 - 12:45 AM. If you are currently happy with Stellarium, however, why would you upgrade? Stellarium is a really nice program.īefore you go the SkyX route, do a little research to make sure that people who use your same equipment are happy. Having used Stellarium in the past, I think that SkyX is more powerful and everything is integrated but it is also more complicated. Moreover, as a local-to-me company, I felt that I had a duty to support them. I have used Bisque software for a long time and I like the company. I could have used a free program like Stellarium or Star Charts on the Windows machine but the Student version of SkyX was cheap and I didn't want to screw around with a different interface. I use "student" on a Windows 8 machine when I'm on the road and just want to look stuff up. I use "Professional" on a Macintosh to run a mount and camera. I, personally, use SkyX and am pleased with it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |